Companies that fail to recover from a major crisis exhibit certain signs before and during the crisis. Some of them are as follows:

• Warnings get ignored- they fall through the cracks
• Executives are overwhelmed or don’t know what to do
• Management is slow in forming a crisis management team
• Who makes decisions? No one knows
• There are no communication protocols in place
• Paralysis starts to set in-some managers are in denial
• Management doesn’t realize that standard corporate processes or procedures don’t work during a crisis
• Legal may be overwhelmed too- it may not grasp all the regulations that are involved, nor know how to report to the government, nor understand its role
• Management has a poor grasp on what steps to take
• The Board may not know what to do or is uncertain as to its role

A crisis is not the time for a company to finally understand what regulations it must follow or what insurance coverage it has or doesn’t have.  A crisis is not the time to come up with a communications plan or a legal analysis of corporate governance responsibilities.   A full blown crisis must be met head on with a crisis management plan that covers operational, legal and communication issues.  It is where the rubber meets the road.  To manage a crisis a plan needs to be in place that addresses all aspects of a crisis. Is your company ready for a crisis?  Can it handle one? Do you have a plan?

On July 7 in Seoul, Korea the KBLA is sponsoring its first Crisis Management Seminar covering all aspects of crisis management.   For those interested, please go to the following link:    http://kbla.info/index.php/crisis

In Order To Suvive A Crisis A Company Must Have An Effective Communications Strategy

The principle focus of any crisis management strategy, especially in an international contest, is communications.  All crisis management plans call for effective crisis communications, which many times are not always executed. Inadequate or failed communications lead to bad publicity, unhappy stakeholders, and potential disaster. An effective crisis communication strategy is necessary for any international crisis.  It should be noted that a number of companies failed to defuse an international crisis because of poor communications.

An ineffective crisis response caused by a failed communications strategy can significantly harm a company’s reputation, operations, and even its position in the marketplace. Whether a company survives a crisis or not is determined less by the severity of the impact than the response to the crisis.  A company that responds effectively with a clear communications strategy will not only survive but find that its reputation has been enhanced.  A company that does not respond with a clear communication strategy may not survive.

Look at some of the crisis in the past which were not defused properly because of a lack of attention to communication- Toyota, perhaps being one of the more recent. Though Toyota spent time and money to find out the issue surrounding the brake issue, its failure to communicate in a timely fashion lost the goodwill of many customers and hurt the brand.

An effective crisis communication strategy is necessary when dealing with an international crisis.     In order to implement an effective crisis communication strategy, a number of processes must be implemented such as::

• Creation of the crisis communication team.
• Identify key spokespersons who will speak for the organization. Who are they? What are their roles?
• Training on cultural issues, if the crisis involves other cultures.
• Establishment of communication procedures and protocols. Who communicates to whom and why?
• Identify key messages to communicate to key stakeholders and groups.
• Has a budget been approved for the crisis?
• Have the facts surrounding the crisis been established?
• How will the company use social media?
• Identify third party consultants that can add value to the communication and PR process- whether it is a PR Communications firm or a third party company.
• Has a communications war room been set up to handle communications?

Though companies try and resolve the crisis at hand and spend significant sums of money to do so, if they fail to properly communicate to the media and the public, they in effect have lost and can expect outrage and consumer dissatisfaction to such an extent that the very existence of the company can be threatened. This is particularly true for cross boarder crisis as the failure to manage international communications can lead to cultural issues which play out in the press or on social media.    So remember, a company doing business internationally has to plan for an eventual crisis which may pose a potential threat to the company.  If it fails to handle communications properly, it faces not only a potential loss of business but a negative impact on its brand and reputation.

The 6  Common Mistakes Or 6 Best Practices That Will Hurt Or Save A Compnay

A crisis happens quickly.  Speed, knowledge and communication are vital if a crisis is to be handled correctly with minimal impact on a company’s bottom line or reputation.  Unfortunately, some companies fail to resolve the crisis and fall into the trap of the 6 deadly mistakes.  Those that successfully resolve the crisis instead, follow the pattern of using the 6 basic crisis management steps. In essence, it is 6 behaviors or steps that will dictate how a company reacts to a crisis and whether it emerges unscathed or mortally wounded.

There are 6 basic common, predictable and avoidable mistakes that companies or organizations make during a crisis that will have a major negative impact on the company’s reputation or brand.  The mistakes cause negative effects including making the crisis worse and failing to solve the crisis which in turn has major legal and reputational implications. The 6 common mistakes are:

1. Ignoring the problem- Management fails to take the problem seriously until it is too late.
2. Assigning blame- Instead of acknowledging the mistake and resolving the crisis, management blames a third party.
3. Paralysis- Instead of taking action to resolve the crisis, management panics causing a negative reaction throughout the company  with a loss of productivity as well as talent.
4. Not telling the whole story- Management tells only a part of the story to the public, causing more bad news to come out during regular news cycles causing negative public opinion.
5. Failure to engage stakeholders- Management fails to reach out to its stakeholders at the beginning causing them to develop their own negative opinions from the news or lack thereof.
6. Killing the messenger- Management punishes those that deliver bad news or allows a corporate culture of punishing employees who raise problems.

Other companies, that don’t fall into the trap of 6 common mistakes, survive an international crisis situation by following the 6 basic steps for crisis resolution- or the 6 best practices of crisis management.  The 6 steps to a successful resolution are:

1. Planning- Management anticipates a potential crisis and plans for it.
2. The appointment of a Crisis Manager- Management has already appointed a Crisis Manager who is familiar with the company, its operations and products.
3. The formation of a Crisis Response Team- Management has already appointed a Crisis Response Team that enables a quick response to the legal, reputational, operational and media issues.
4. Knowledge of the foreign situation impacted by the crisis- In case of a cross border crisis, management has taken steps to learn what the issues are on the ground.
5. Proper international communications and PR- A communications team has been set up to deal with the international and domestic news and media.
6. Management of the crisis claims (legal, etc.)- Legal has taken steps to properly manage the claims and government investigations caused by the crisis.

An example of a crisis that involved most of the 6 basic or common mistakes centers on a recent acceleration/gas pedal recall involving a car manufacturer.  The manufacturer was apparently put on notice of a large number of complaints involving acceleration/gas pedal problems.  However, it did nothing to thoroughly investigate the issues or communicate to the public that it was seriously investigating the issue (It ignored the problem).  It denied such problems were due to mechanical issues.  Several years after it first became aware of the potential acceleration issues, it was forced to seriously investigate the matter because of several fatal car crashes potentially involving unintended acceleration.  The car crashes were widely reported in the media.  Because it failed to handle the crisis properly at the beginning, the car manufacturer was severely criticized in the media for its lack of response and apparent disregard of its customers' safety (Management had become paralyzed). The public became outraged when it learned  the car maker began investigating the acceleration problems in earnest only after the fatal car crashes- 2 years after numerous reports had been made ( It didn’t tell the whole story).  The US Congress then got into the act holding hearings on the acceleration issue.( It didnt understand the cross border issues).   The company ended up recalling over 8 Million cars worldwide and finally appointing a safety officer, etc. in the US.  Though it began to communicate more effectively, the car maker's penchant for secrecy, failed communications and lack of a crisis management plan at the beginning severely impacted the company (It didn’t reach out to its Stakeholders).

In the end, the company was hit with over 130 class action lawsuits in the US.   Billions of dollars in share value evaporated due to its stock's decreased share value. Because of its failure to properly manage the crisis, it lost almost 6% market share in the US - reflecting a tarnished reputation.  Though it is now regaining market share, it continues to have recall problems and brand issues.

So, whether a company survives a crisis intact depends to a certain degree of whether it makes the 6 basic common mistakes or uses the 6 best practices of crisis management. Either way, it’s a 6 step process to defeat or victory.

Use KRIs To Create An Early Warning System 

During the lazy days of Summer, companies or organizations tend to slow down.   People   go on vacation, customers or vendors go into Summer mode, organizations think less about  risk management and more about company picnics or other fun events. People start thinking more about vacations and less about reality.  When companies least expect things to go wrong they sometimes do. Not only do minor things go wrong but major crises tends to pop up, threatening the existence of the corporation itself!  Companies are not only blindsighted when a crisis happens  but sometimes they are completely unprepared.

A crisis is defined as a major unpredictable event that has potentially negative or catastrophic results.  In today's business climate, where the culture of attack looms over any corporation that is unfortunate enough to receive bad publicity, companies cannot afford to conduct business without a proper crisis management plan in effect. Remember, unlike twenty years ago, a company can no longer handle a crisis by issuing a simple PR statement or marketing statement.  A full fledged crisis management operation is usually required.

When a crisis happens people are often caught off guard.  Some don’t even prepare for crisis or are blissfully unaware of the  crisis lurking outside.  And in the case of cross-border crisis, they  are of course harder to manage than  pure domestic ones.  As international commerce and business adds an additional layer of complexity to any crisis situation, cultural and communication issues become front and center to any crisis management plan.

Therefore, when considering a crisis management plan, it helps to be proactive.  It helps to identify potential crisis scenarios and prepare for the worst by running simulations.  How will the company handle major crisis such as injury or death caused by its products?  Or how will the company handle a  media crisis resulting from the theft of its IP or customer data?  Sometimes, however, it may be harder to identify areas of potential crisis.  When that happens, I recommend that a company seriously considers developing effective, high-quality key risk indicators ( KRIs) that can provide metrics on risk exposure and early warning indicators.

KRIs , if developed properly can be used as an early warning system that may prevent crisis before they happen or at least warn the company in time of a potential crisis.  That way, a company may be able to take proactive steps prior to a crisis to contain it or even prevent it. Examples of KRIs includes:

1. A review of industry data showing incidents and losses throughout the industry ( if it happened to a competitor, it might happen to you) that could have an impact on your company as well.
2. A review of actual losses and incidents in the company. How many product failures did the service department report?  Check to see if your company has loss event databases that could provide input on the kinds of events that could cause major losses.
3. A review of regulatory standards in your industry.  Regulatory standards can give you an idea of the policies and regulations that govern your business activities and the underlying reasons why.
4. Risk assessments- what risk assessments have been already done?
5. A look at historical data.  Historical data could give you an insight into expected losses.
6. Stakeholder requirements- what are the requirements and expectations of your stakeholders?  Especially in a crisis?  Perhaps you can use these requirements when confronting a crisis or in developing an early warning system.

Once you have obtained these reports ( note they are data intensive) you have the beginning of KRIs and a good early warning system.  Create a dashboard on your computer tailored to providing you with a picture of potential risks that could result in crisis.  The dashboard can provide an excellent early warning system as to certain events that may result in a potential crisis. Remember, some crisis can be avoided if proper steps are taken before an incident evolves into a mega-crisis.

Korea’s Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission ( ACRC) recently published its annual report setting forth its major accomplishments for 2015.  Though the ACRC was established in 2008, it has recently become very proactive in its measures to fight corruption in Korea.  (more…)

For those of you who engage in business, everyone knows that  properly managing risk plays an important part in the success of a company.   However,  though some companies may acknowledge the benefits of risk management , many don't consider  legal risk management  (LRM) processes when trying to mitigate or control and manage litigation risk issues,  government investigations as well as legal liability. The benefits of ERM managment is never fully realized, leaving the company exposed to the tremendous costs associated with legal and corporate liability.